Publication Ethics Statement

This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including authors, peer reviewers, editors, and publisher.

Section A: Publication

  1. All submitted papers go through a strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers.
  2. The review process is blind peer review.
  3. The factors taken into account in the review are relevance, novelty, originality, and readability.
  4. Possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. Although authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit submissions, no guarantee revised submissions will be accepted.
  6. Articles that are rejected will not be re-reviewed.
  7. No research may be included in more than one publication.

 Section B : Author’s responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscript is their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not been published before or is not being evaluated for publication elsewhere.
  3. Authors must ensure that their work does not contain any illegal statements and any comments that may violate the law.
  4. The paper must contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to imitate the work.
  5. Authors must participate in the peer-review process.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must make a significant contribution to the research.
  7. The author must certify that all data in this paper is original and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editor of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used someone else's work and/or words then this has been appropriately quoted or cited.
  10. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  11. When an author finds significant errors in his/her published work, the author must immediately notify the journal editor and work with the editor to correct the paper.

 Section C : Reviewers’s responsibilities

  1. Reviewers must keep all information about the paper confidential and treat it as a confidential documents.
  2. Reviews should be carried out objectively, without personal criticism of the author
  3. The identity of the reviewers must be kept confidential
  4. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  5. Reviewers should identify relevant published works that has not been cited by the authors.
  6. Reviewers should also call the Chief Editor's attention if there is a substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers that they are personally aware of.
  7. All papers will be read critically by at least two anonymous reviewers. A paper may be accepted in its original form, subject to revision, or rejection.
  8. Suggestions from reviewers (and editors) will be submitted to the author, who then has the opportunity to revise the paper.
  9. All submitted papers will be checked for their originalities using Turnitin.
  10. Reviewers must complete the evaluation of the manuscript within a reasonable time and notify the editor immediately if the work cannot be completed on schedule 

Section D : Reviewers’s responsibilities

  1. Editors have full responsibility and authority to accept/reject an articles.
  2. Editors are responsible for the content and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should base their decisions only on the importance, originality, clarity, and relevance of the paper to the scope of the publication.
  4. Editors must keep the reviewers' names confidential.
  5. Editors must ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  6. Editors are responsible to consider all the submitted manuscripts within a reasonable timeframe.
  7. Editors must ensure that no personal information of authors are included in the manuscript which is sent to the reviewers