Peer Review Process / Policy

Crane Journal implements the following review process policy:

Manuscripts sent by authors will go through a review process by the editor, especially checking the suitability of the manuscript with the scope of the journal and the suitability with the Journal template. In this process, the editor will communicate with the author so that the manuscript is worthy of being sent to the Reviewer or even returned/declined.
Manuscripts that have passed step 1 above are sent to 2 reviewers to review their content using the double blind review method.
The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
Reviewers will suggest improvements and/or accept/reject the article.
The editor will decide by considering the reviewer's suggestions whether the manuscript meets the requirements of Crane Journal.
The editor's decision is final.