Some policies in the review of MAJALAH ILMIAH UNIKOM
- Reviewers will review any submitted paper.
- The review process employs Double-blind Review that the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.
- In the review process, reviewers consider the correspondence of title, abstract, discussion (findings), and conclusions. Also, reviewers consider the novelty, scientific impact, and references used in the paper.
![](/public/site/images/utari/Bagan_Peer_Reviewer_Process.jpg)
The response of the reviewers will be the basis for the Editor to conclude:
- Accept Submission
- Revisions Required
- Resubmit for review
- Resubmit elsewhere
- Decline Submission
An article was rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:
- The article does not fit the scope of the journal.
- The article does not follow the rules of writing scientific papers or author guidelines.
- The fundamental methodological errors.
- The author refuses to make suggestions for improvements provided by the reviewer without a logical basis.
- There are indications of plagiarism of more than 20%.