HILLARY CLINTON VS DONALD TRUMP: QUO VADIS INTERVENSI KEMANUSIAAN?
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini membahas perbandingan kebijakan luar negeri Hillary Clinton dan Donald Trump terkait legitimasi intervensi kemanusiaan dalam kebijakan luar negeri Amerika Serikat. Kedua kandidat calon presiden memiliki kebijakan luar negeri yang berbeda dan berlawanan. Pertanyaan penelitian yang dibahas adalah bagaimana memahami perbedaan kebijakan luar negeri Clinton dan Trump mengenai intervensi kemanusiaan dengan menggunakan teori English School. Konsep yang digunakan penelitian ini adalah intervensi kemanusiaan dan kebijakan luar negeri. Penelitian ini menghasilkan dua kesimpulan. Pertama, masalah hak asasi manusia yang dibawa oleh Clinton di berbagai negara dapat menjadi rivalitas baru bagi AS. Kedua, Tiongkok sebagai negara ekonomi terbesar di Asia harus siap menghadapi ancaman ekonomi dan keamanan yang dibawa oleh Trump atau Clinton.
Article Details
Issue
Section
References
Amstutz, Mark. 2013. International Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Cases in Global Politics. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefied.
Bellamy, Alex. 2011. Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect: from Words to Deeds. Oxon: Routledge.
—. 2009. Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Polity Press. Breuning, Maurijke. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Brown, Chris. 2001. Understanding International Relations. New York: Palgrave.
Brown, Michael Edward. 1996. International Dimension of Internal Conflict. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Butterfield, Herbert, and Martin Wight. 1966. Diplomatic Investigation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Clinton, Hillary. 2011. America's Pacific Century. October 11. Accessed November 11, 2017. http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/.
Creswell, John W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitave and Mixed Methods Approach. California: Sage Publications.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Evans, Gareth, and Mohamed Sahnoun. 2002. "The Responsibility to Protect." Foreign Affairs 99-110.
Henriksen, Thomas H. 2012. America and the Rogue States. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Holsti, K.J. 1992. International Politics: a Framework for Analysis. New Jersey: Simon & Schuster.
JenÄa, Miroslav. 2013. "The Concept of Preventive Diplomacy." Security and Human Rights 183-194.
Kaplan, Morton. 1968. "Systems Theory and Political Science." Social Research 30-47.
Kurki, Milja, and Colin Wight. 2010. "International Relations and Social Science." In International Relations Theories: Disciplines and Diversity, by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith, 14-36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laville, Helen. 2011. "American Foreign Policy and Women's Right." In Challenging US Foreign Policy, by Bevan Sewell and Scott Lucas, 260-281.
Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. McCrisken, Trevor. 2003. American Exceptionalism and the Legacy of Vietnam. Basingstoke: Palgrave
MacMillan.
Overhaus, Marco, and Lars Brozus. 2016. US Foreign Policy after the 2016 Elections. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
Resnick, Evan N. 2016. Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy Paradox. Singapore: RSIS.
Reus-Smith, Christian. 2009. "Constructivism and the English School." In Theorising International Society: English School Method, by Cornelia Navari, 58-78. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Rosenau, James. 1995. "Governance in the Twenty-First Century." Global
Governance 13-43.
Viotti, Paul R. , and Mark V. Kauppi. 1997. International Relations and World Politics: Security Economy & Identity. Upper Saddle River: Prentice River.
Wiarda, Howard. 2011. American Foreign Policy in a Region of Conflict: A Global Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.