Peer Review Process

Every manuscript written in the OJS @is The Best will be reviewed by two reviewers (double-blind reviewers). If one reviewer rejects the article, the editor will send the article to the third reviewer. The decision to accept or reject the article script is decided in the Editor's meeting by considering the recommendations and notes made by the reviewer.

Assessment criteria in the review process:
1. Scientific Coverage
2. Insight Aspirations
3. Scientific Pioneerity and Originality of Works
4. The Meaning of Donations for the Advancement of Science
5. Scientific Impact
6. Comparison of Primary Reference with other sources
7. Degree of Updating Library Reference
8. Analysis and Synthesis
9. Conclusion

The OJS @is The Best reviewer mechanism video can be accessed via the following link: