[2] H. Limanseto, “Memeratakan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia, Pemerintah Dorong Pengembangan PSN Prioritas di Berbagai Wilayah,” Surabaya, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/4660/memeratakan-pembangunan-ekonomi-di-indonesia-pemerintah-dorong-pengembangan-psn-prioritas-di-berbagai-wilayah
[3] A. B. Susanto and L. Rachmawati, “Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan (IPM) dan Inflasi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Lamongan,” J. Pendidik. Ekon., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2013.
[4] “Konsep Indeks Pembangunan Manusia,” Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/subject /26/indeks-pembangunan-manusia.html (accessed Jul. 18, 2023).
[5] S. Rahmadi and P. Parmadi, “Pengaruh Ketimpangan Pendapatan dan Kemiskinan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Antar Pulau di Indonesia,” J. Paradig. Ekon., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 55–66, 2019.
[6] R. Ronaldo, “Pengaruh Inflasi dan Tingkat Pengangguran terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Makro di Indonesia,” J. Ekon., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 137–153, 2019.
[7] G. A. Dito and A. A. Nurussadad, “STA551 Pemodelan Klasifikasi - Analisis Cluster dengan R,” 2021. https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws. com/805596_1c2dc0d4e5364833abda18b3b9deb42d.html# (accessed Nov. 03, 2023).
[8] R. A. Johnson and D. W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Sixth. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
[9] C. G. Thompson, R. S. Kim, A. M. Aloe, and B. J. Becker, “Extracting the Variance In flation Factor and Other Multicollinearity Diagnostics from Typical Regression Results,” Basic Appl. Soc. Psych., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2017.
[10] R. F. Lanclan, “Hopkins Statistic,” ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Hopkins-statistic-of-clustering-tendency-for-k-nearest-neighbor-distances-in-chaffinches_fig5_41531093 (accessed Jul. 18, 2023).
[11] A. Anjani Arifiyanti, F. Setiyo Darusman, and B. Widyo Trenggono, “Population Density Cluster Analysis in DKI Jakarta Province Using K-Means Algorithm,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 772–783, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://journal-isi.org/index.php/isi
[12] M. Benri, H. Metisen, and S. Latipa, “Analisis Clustering Menggunakan Metode K-Means Dalam Pengelompokkan Penjualan Produk Pada Swalayan Fadhila,” J. Media Infotama, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 110–118, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287160954.pdf
[13] “2.3.2. K-Means,” scikit learn. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/clustering.html#k-means (accessed Jul. 18, 2023).
[14] D. Marlina, N. Lina, A. Fernando, and A. Ramadhan, “Implementasi Algoritma K-Medoids dan K-Means untuk Pengelompokkan Wilayah Sebaran Cacat pada Anak,” J. CoreIT J. Has. Penelit. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 64–71, 2018.
[15] E. T. Luthfi, “Fuzzy C-Means Untuk Clustering Data (Studi Kasus : Data Performance Mengajar Dosen),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. 2007, pp. 1–7, 2007.
[16] A. W. Wijayanto and Takdir, “Fighting Cyber Crime in Email Spamming: An Evaluation of Fuzzy Clustering Approach to Classify Spam Messages,” Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Syst. Innov. ICITSI 2014, pp. 19–24, 2014.
[17] “2.3.6. Hierarchical Clustering,” scikit learn. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/ clustering.html#hierarchical-clustering (accessed Jul. 18, 2023).
[18] C. Suhaeni, A. Kurnia, and R. Ristiyanti, “Perbandingan Hasil Pengelompokan menggunakan Analisis Cluster Berhirarki, K-Means Cluster, dan Cluster Ensemble (Studi Kasus Data Indikator Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu Hamil),” J. Media Infotama, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2018.
[19] N. Thamrin and A. W. Wijayanto, “Analisis Cluster dengan Menggunakan Hard Clustering dan Soft Clustering untuk Pengelompokkan Tingkat Kesejahteraan Kabupaten/Kota di Pulau Jawa,” Indones. J. Stat. Its Appl., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 141–160, 2021.
[20] N. N. Halim and E. Widodo, “Clustering Dampak Gempa Bumi di Indonesia Menggunakan Kohonen Self Organizing Maps,” Pros. SI MaNIS (Seminar Nas. Integr. Mat. dan Nilai Islam., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 188–194, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/SIMANIS/article/view/62
[21] M. A. Nahdliyah, T. Widiharih, and A. Prahutama, “Metode K-Medoids Clustering dengan Validasi Silhoutte Index dan C-Index (Studi Kasus Jumlah Kriminalitas Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Tengah Tahun 2018),” J. Gaussian, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2019.
[22] H. Malikhatin, A. Rusgiyono, and D. A. I. Maruddani, “Penerapan K-Modes Clustering dengan Validasi Dunn Index pada Pengelompokan Karakteristik Calon TKI Menggunakan R-GUI,” J. Gaussian, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 359–366, 2021.
[23] N. Afira and A. W. Wijayanto, “Analisis Cluster dengan Metode Partitioning dan Hierarki pada Data Informasi Kemiskinan Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2019,” Komputika J. Sist. Komput., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2021.
[24] Badan Pusat Statistik, “Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2022,” Jakarta, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/ 2022/11/07/1916/agustus-2022--tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka--tpt--sebesar-5-86-persen-dan-rata-rata-upah-buruh-sebesar-3-07-juta-rupiah-per-bulan.html
- Abstract viewed - 24 times
- PDF downloaded - 18 times
Affiliations
I Kadek Mira Merta Ningsih
Politeknik Statistika STIS
Arie Wahyu Wijayanto
Affiliation not stated
Analisis Cluster Provinsi di Indonesia Berdasarkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Tahun 202
Vol 13 No 1 (2024): Komputika: Jurnal Sistem Komputer
Abstract
Economic development is a central agenda that aims to develop a country's economy in a sustainable manner. Indonesia's economy in 2022 grew by 5,31 percent, higher than the achievements in 2021. Therefore, considering that the economy is a very crucial sector, equitable distribution of economic growth is an important thing to pay attention to for the equal welfare of the Indonesian people. Researchers conducted an analysis related to the grouping of economic growth conditions of provinces in Indonesia in 2022 using the K-Means, K-Medoids, Hierarchical and Fuzzy C-Means Clustering. The data used are 9 variables of economic growth in 34 provinces in Indonesia in 2022. The final result was obtained by the Hierarchical Ward method with 2 cluster as the best method based on the results of internal validation and stability validation. In this method, cluster 1 is obtained totaling 28 provinces while cluster 2 totaling 6 provinces. The characteristics of cluster 1 are high economic growth seen from the variable value of factors forming high HDI but still have a high open unemployment rate, while the characteristics of cluster 2, namely low economic growth, are known from the value of the gini ratio and a high percentage of poor people.