PENGARUH STRUKTUR AKTIVA DAN RETURN ON ASSETS TERHADAP DEBT RATIO (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2008-2010)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34010/jra.v7i1.519Abstract
Debt Ratio plays a role in companies because it gives information about the
proportion of debt use to pay every assets of the company. In determining Debt Ratio
composition, the company can consider factors influencing Debt Ratio, such as Assets
Structure and ROA. The aim of this research is to find out the influence of Assets
Structure and ROA toward Debt Ratio in mining companies listed in BEI 2008-2010
period.
The method used in this research is analysis method descriptive and
verification. Technique to determine data is using secondary data obtained from
documentation. The samples in this research used purposive sampling method. The
annual financial statements used are from 15 mining companies of 2008-2010 for
about 45 samples. The employed statistics test is multiple linier regression and
hypotheses test using F and T-test. These tests use SPSS 20.0 for Windows
application help.
The results showed that Assets Structure affects positively to Debt Ratio, and
ROA affects negatively to Debt Ratio. The conclusion of this research Assets Structure
affects significantly to Debt Ratio, and ROA affects significantly to Debt Ratio. Assets
Structure and ROA have strong relation and affects significantly to Debt Ratio in mining
companies.
References
AgusSartono. 2008. Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Arthur J. Keown et al. 2001. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Ketujuh.
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
BambangRiyanto. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Pembelanjaan. Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Brigham, E.F., & Houston J.F. 2006.Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi
Kesepuluh. Buku Dua. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Darsono dan Ashari. 2005. Pedoman Praktis Memahami Laporan Keuangan.
Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
Gitman, Lawrence J. 2009.Principle of Managerial Finance, 12th Edition. Boston:
Prentice Hall
Glenn Indrajaya, Herlinadan Rini Setiadi. 2011. Pengaruh Struktur Aktiva, Ukuran
Perusahaan. Tingkat pertumbuhan, Profitabilitas dan Risiko Bisnis Terhadap
Struktur Modal.Akurat Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Nomor 06 Tahun ke-2.
Gujarati, Damodar N. 2003. Basic Econometrics.Fourth Edition. New York: McGrawHill.
Husein,
Umar.
Metodologi
Penelitian.
Jakarta:
Raja
Grafindo.
Indri,
Erkaningrum
F.
Faktor
–
Faktor
Penentu
Financial
Leverage
Dalam
Struktur
Modal.Jurnal
Bisnis
dan
Akuntansi
“Analisisâ€.Volume
,
Nomor
Joni
dan Lina. 2010. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Struktur Modal. Jurnal Bisnis
dan Akuntansi. 12(2): 81-96.
Kasmir.2010. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
LukasSetya Atmaja. 2008. Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Andi
Myers and Majluf. 1984. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms
Have Informations Investor Do Not Have. Journal of Financing Economisc. 13:
-221.
Suci, Pujiani dan Prasetiono.2012.Analisis Pengaruh Return on Assets, Sales Growth,
Structure Assets, Firm Size, dan Investment Opportunity Terhadap Financial
Leverage.Dipenogoro Journal of Management. 1(1): 158-171.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutrisno. 2008. Manajemen Keuangan Teori, Konsep dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta:
Penerbit Ekonosia.
Syamsudin, Lukman 2007.Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan (Konsep Aplikasi Dalam
Perencanaan Pengawasan dan Pengambilan Keputusan). Jakarta: PT. Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Umi, Narimawati dkk. 2010. Penulisan Karya Ilmiah: Panduan Awal Menyusun Skripsi
dan Tugas Akhir. Jakarta: Genesis.
Weston, J.Fred & Eugene F. Brigham 2005.Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi
Kesembilan. Jilid 1 dan 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Weston, J.Fred & Thomas E. Copeland 2008.Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan.Jilid
Jakarta: Erlangga.