Penilaian Maturity Level Perangkat Lunak Menggunakan CMMI-Dev 1.3 pada Aplikasi Manans MINT

Yumma Yustika Asmy; Leonardi Paris Hasugian

doi:10.34010/jamika.v11i2.5523

Yumma Yustika Asmy Universitas Komputer
Leonardi Paris Hasugian Universitas Komputer Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34010/jamika.v11i2.5523

Keywords: Assessment Software, CMMI-Dev 1.3, Maturity Level, PIECES, RACI Chart

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the Maturity Level achievement of the Manans MINT application from the software assessment process using CMMI-Dev 1.3 the extent to which application software development supports Manan's Farm business process activities. Capability Maturity Model Integration was chosen because it is an approach that provides important elements to improve company performance. Research aids in analyzing data use PIECES to identify and classify problems with the current system. The research method uses qualitative and quantitative descriptive writing techniques. In this study, Staged Representation is used as a process of grouping areas and RACI Chart to determine the appropriate respondents. The final result of this research is the calculation of Maturity Level results with recommendations for process improvement of the Manans MINT application software. Manans MINT is in mature position 2, namely Managed. The average condition of the readiness level for the calculation of Generic Practices has the required proportion and has been applied at 85%. Meanwhile, the maturity level of Specific Practices for REQM and PMC process areas is 90% and 72.5%, respectively. This research become the basis for improving the work system of the Manans MINT application so that the successful goal of building Manan's Farm can be achieved.

References

J. K. Pembangunan, “Peran Komunikasi dalam Modernisasi Pertanian Berbasis Koperasi,” J. Komun. Pembang., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 246271, 2010, doi: 10.29244/jurnalkmp.8.1.%p.

H. Maulana, “Pengukuran Tingkat Kematangan Keselarasan Strategi Ti Dan Bisnis (Studi Kasus Universitas Xyz),” Komputa J. Ilm. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2019, doi: 10.34010/komputa.v4i1.2405.

D.-H. Bae, “Software Process Improvement for Small Organizations,” no. Compsac, pp. 17–17, 2007, doi: 10.1109/compsac.2007.193.

A. M. Mahmud, A. Rachmadi, and M. C. Saputra, “Penilaian Kapabilitas Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak Pada Perusahaan Pengembang Perangkat Lunak Menggunakan CMMI – DEV 1 . 3 (Studi Kasus PT. Cendana Teknika Utama),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 5567–5576, 2018.

W. Widodo, “EVALUASI PROSES PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT LUNAK PADA VIRTUAL TEAM DEVELOPMENT MENGGUNAKAN CMMI Versi 1.3,” J. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.26555/jifo.v10i1.a3345.

B. Tama and I. Silanegara, “Strategi Pemilihan Kontraktor Perangkat Lunak Dengan Memanfaatkan Pengetahuan Terhadap Capability Maturity Model Integration for Development (Cmmi for Dev),” Sriwij. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009.

M. Bolung and H. R. K. Tampangela, “Analisa Penggunaan Metodologi Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak,” J. ELTIKOM, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.31961/eltikom.v1i1.1.

A. Bhimasta and Y. Oslan, “Implementasi Cmmi Pada Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Matakuliah Skripsi, Kerja Praktik, Dan Pemrograman Terintegrasi Terapan Di Program Studi Sistem Informasi …,” J. Eksplor. Karya Sist. Inf. dan …, no. Cmmi, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://ti.ukdw.ac.id/ojs/index.php/eksis/article/view/356.

Software Engineering Institute, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.3,” Softw. Eng. Process Manag. Progr., no. November, pp. 1–520, 2010.

M. Isa, “Penerapan CMMI Roadmaps Dalam Menilai Tingkat Kematangan Proses Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak,” J. Ilm. Komputasi, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2020, doi: 10.32409/jikstik.19.1.159.

A. Sodik, Z. Jiwa, H. Tarigan, C. Maturity, M. Integration, and T. Kematangan, “PENILAIAN KEMATANGAN EMPAT PROSES AREA LEVEL 2 CMMI VERSI 1 . 2 DI CV CREACTIVE INDONESIA,” pp. 103–108, 2018.

L. D. B. Whitten, JeHrey L and Both, Analysis and Design Methods., vol. 18, no. 4. 2007.

A. D. M. Guido Waluyan1, “Evaluasi Kinerja Tata Kelola TI Terhadap Penerapan Sistem Informasi Starclick Framework COBIT 5 (Studi Kasus: PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk Semarang),” vol. 02, 2016, doi: 10.1038/249668a0.

ISACA, Enabling Processes. 2012.

M. I. Wibisono, K. Karmilasari, and A. Subiyakto, “Penilaian Kematangan Proses Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak Menggunakan Capability Maturity Model Integration Roadmaps,” Appl. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2021, doi: 10.15408/aism.v3i2.14530.

R. Maulidya and A. Rachmadi, “Penilaian Tingkat Kematangan Proses Pengelolaan Proyek Dalam Project NCX ( New Customer Xperience ) Menggunakan CMMI – ACQ ( Studi Kasus : PT XYZ ),” Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3325–3334, 2019.

I. Permatahati, W. W. Winarno, and M. P. Kurniawan, “Penerapan Capability Maturity Model Integration Untuk Mengukur Tingkat Kematangan Organisasi Dalam Proses Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak (Studi Kasus: Direktorat Innovation Center Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta),” J. Teknol. Inf., vol. Vol. XV No, pp. 43–49, 2020.