Peer Review Process
We are committed to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted articles in Global Political Studies Journal (GPSJournal) (P-ISSN 2301-749X, E-ISSN 2686-2905) To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process (approximately 12 weeks).
We only publish articles that have been reviewed and approved by highly qualified researchers with expertise in a field appropriate for the article. We used a double-blind peer-reviewing process. Detailed information about the flow for the manuscript submission (author) to the acceptance by the editor is shown in the following figure.
In short, the steps are:
- Manuscript Submission (by author) (step 1)
- Manuscript Check and Selection (by editor in chief and editors) (step 2). Editors have a right to directly accept, reject, or review. Prior to further processing steps, a plagiarism check using Turnitin is applied for each manuscript.
- Manuscript Reviewing Process (by reviewers) (step 3-4)
- Notification of Manuscript Acceptance, Revision, or Rejection (by editor to author based on reviewer’s comments) (step 5)
- Paper Revision (by author)
- Revision Submission based on Reviewer Suggestion (by author) with similar flow to point number 1. (step 1)
- If reviewer seems to be satisfied with revision, notification for acceptance (by editor). (step 6)
- Galley proof and publishing process (step 7 and 8)
The steps point number 1 to 5 is considered as 1 round of peer-reviewing process. And, our reviewing process at least goes through 2 round of reviewing process.
The journal editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. The following are the most common decisions:
- Accept without any changes (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper in its original form
- Accept with minor revisions (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper and asks the author to make small corrections
- Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): the journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors
- Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): the journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes
- Reject the paper (outright rejection): the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the authors make major revisions
Note:
There is no communication between authors and editors concerning the rejection decision.
Authors whose papers are rejected will be informed with the reasons for the rejection.