AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN BILATERAL TERKAIT PINJAMAN KEPADA CHINA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL

Keywords: Cancellation of Bilateral Agreement;, Loans to China;, International Law.

Abstract

The One Belt One Road (OBOR) project initiated by the Chinese Government has gripped countries in the international community. Especially to Southeast Asia, where Malaysia and Indonesia are borrowing countries to China. Replacement of government in Malaysia related to corruption cases 1 MDB, resulting in changes in government policy Malaysia. The cancellation basis, because all the raw materials or the materials used are from China following also engineers and unskilled laborers, thus causing a massive migration from China to Malaysia. In the case of this cancellation, of course, the legal consequences for Malaysia as a borrowing country and China as a lending country. Unlike Indonesia, which until now, it is known that the Indonesian Government has established bilateral relations with the Chinese Government in terms of infrastructure development, such as: toll road and airport in Indonesia. The main problem in this study, namely if this bilateral dispute is brought to the International Court of Justice, is the mechanism for executing an international court decision to be issued later.

Author Biography

Tri Murti Lubis, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Tri Murti Lubis is a student of the Doctor of Law Program at the USU Faculty of Law, Medan. Born in Medan, completed his undergraduate program in 2009 and master's program in 2011 at USU, Medan. Apart from being a student, Tri is also teaching staff at the Department of Economic Law, Faculty of Law at USU, Medan, who teaches courses in capital market law, corporate organization law, and bankruptcy law, and conducts research activities in the field of law and community service.

References

Adolf, Huala., Hukum Perdagangan Internasional, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.

Bungin, Burhan., Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Fajar, Mukti., dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum-Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.

Harian Kompas, “Sri Langka Bantah China Dirikan Pangkalanâ€, diterbitkan Rabu, 10 Oktober 2018.

Kartini, Indriana., “Kebijakan Jalur Sutra Baru Cina dan Implikasinya bagi Amerika Serikatâ€, Jurnal Kajian Wilayah Vol. 6 No. 2, (2015).

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar., Pengantar Hukum Internasional, Bandung: Alumni, 2003.

Law-Justice Portal Berita dan Investigasi, “PM Malaysia Mahathir Berani Tolak Bayar Hutang dan Usir Pekerja Chinaâ€, diterbitkan Senin, 01 April 2019, https://www.law-justice.co/artikel/62831/pm-malaysia-mahathir-berani-tolak-bayar-hutang-dan-usir-pekerja-china/., diakses Senin, 02 September 2019.

Majalah Tempo, “Utang Indonesia di Bank Yang Dipelopori China Tembus Rp. 13 triliunâ€, diterbitkan Senin, 02 September 2019.

Majalah Tempo, “Walhi : Proyek OBOR Cina Bisa Timbulkan Jebakan Utang Baruâ€, diterbitkan Senin, 29 April 2019.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud., Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2007.

Soekanto, Soerjono., Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.

Sood, Muhammad., Hukum Perdagangan Internasional, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.

Suryokusumo, Sumaryo., Hukum Perjanjian Internasional, Jakarta: Tata Nusa, 2008.

United Nation, “Vienna Convention on The Law of Treaties Between States and International Organization or Between International Organizationsâ€, Indonesian Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 1, (2005).

Website Resmi CNN Indonesia, “Perang Dagang Bikin RI Makin ‘Tekor’ Dari Chinaâ€, diterbitkan Senin, 24 Juni 2019, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190624151044-92-405895/perang-dagang-bikin-ri-makin-tekor-dari-china., diakses Senin, 02 September 2019.

Zed, Mestika., Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan, Ed. Ke-2, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2008.

Published
2021-01-31
How to Cite
Lubis, Tri. 2021. “AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN BILATERAL TERKAIT PINJAMAN KEPADA CHINA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL”. Res Nullius Law Journal 3 (1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v3i1.3830.