https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/issue/feed Global Political Studies Journal 2022-12-28T14:25:48+07:00 Sylvia Octa Putri sylvia.octa.putri@email.unikom.ac.id Open Journal Systems <table> <tbody> <tr> <td align="left" valign="top"> <p><strong>GLOBAL POLITICAL STUDIES JOURNAL</strong>&nbsp;</p> <p>is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published twice a year, every April and October. GPS Journal published by the Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Komputer Indonesia (UNIKOM). GPS Journal accepts both research and opinion articles. Theme and method might be various, which includes but is not limited to:</p> <ul> <li class="show">Foreign Policy and Diplomacy</li> <li class="show">International Political Economy and Multinational Corporations</li> <li class="show">International Security Studies</li> <li class="show">International Institutions</li> <li class="show">International Law</li> <li class="show">Environment and Climate Change</li> <li class="show">Gender in International Relations</li> <li class="show">Regional Studies</li> <li class="show">Conflict Resolutions</li> <li class="show">Transnational Movement and Globalization</li> </ul> </td> <td align="left" valign="top"> <p><span style="unicode-bidi: embed;"><img src="/public/site/images/dewitri/Vol._3_No_.1_April_2019_2.jpg" width="302" height="427"></span><span style="direction: rtl;">&nbsp; </span></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <p><a title="SINTA - Global Political Studies Journal" href="https://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/journals/profile/6040" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Global Political Studies Journal Accreditations is SINTA 5</a>. Accreditation is valid for 5 (five) years, namely Volume 1 Number 2 April 2018&nbsp; until Volume 6 Number 1 April&nbsp; 2023.<br> Decree Number: 36/E/KPT/2019<br> Decree Title: Ranking of Accreditation for Scientific Journal Period VII 2019<br> Decree Date: December 13, 2019</p> <p><img style="width: 50%;" src="/public/site/images/sylvia/Sertifikat_Akreditasi_GPSJournal.jpg"></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3>Indexed by:</h3> <p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ePiDGekAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="/public/site/images/dewitri/googlescholar1.png">&nbsp;&nbsp;</a><a href="http://garuda.ristekdikti.go.id/journal/view/16618" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="/public/site/images/dewitri/garuda.png">&nbsp;&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.base-search.net/Search/Results?lookfor=global+political+studies+journal&amp;name=&amp;oaboost=1&amp;newsearch=1&amp;refid=dcbasen" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="/public/site/images/dewitri/06_base.png"></a><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ePiDGekAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&nbsp;&nbsp;</a><a href="https://search.crossref.org/?q=2686-2905" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="/public/site/images/dewitri/crossref.png"></a><a href="http://sinta2.ristekdikti.go.id/journals/detail?id=6040" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img style="width: 222px;" src="/public/site/images/dewitri/images_sinta51.jpg"></a></p> https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/article/view/7913 Manajemen Konflik Hak Penerbitan Berita Google dan Australia 2022-12-28T14:25:48+07:00 Haris Saefulloh harissaefulloh12@gmail.com Ludiro Madu ludiromadu@upnyk.ac.id <p><em>Google and Australia undertake news publishing rights conflict management in 2021. In that conflict Australia wants Google to pay media companies for any news they publish online. The peak of the conflict occurred when Google did not agree and had threatened to leave. The theory used in this research is conflict management theory. The theory states that there are five types of conflict management that can be used depending on the priorities of the conflict actors. This type of research is a descriptive qualitative research. Data was collected using the document method which was then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. The result of this research is that Google and Australia have reached a compromise after one year of negotiations in the conflict of news publishing rights. This compromise is contained in an amendment to the News Media Bargaining Code which was originally used as a tool for the Australian Government to achieve its goals.</em></p> <p><em>&nbsp;</em><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><strong><em> : </em></strong><em>Australia, Digital Platform, Google, News Media Bargaining Code</em></p> 2022-12-28T03:06:05+07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/article/view/7996 Kerjasama Indonesia-Australia Dalam Menanggulangi Illegal, Unreported, Unregulated Fishing Di Laut Timor Australia Tahun 2017-2021 2022-12-28T13:57:47+07:00 Chenika Fricila chenikafricila@upnvj.ac.id R. Dudy Heryadi dudy.heryadi@upnvj.ac.id Dairatul Ma’arif dairatul@upnvj.ac.id <p><em>Indonesia and Australia are two partner countries that are actively cooperating in the fisheries sector with the aim of tackling IUU fishing. Despite that both countries have taken many approaches and policies, the number of IUU fishing case is still remain high. One area that is vulnerable to these activities is the Australian Timor Sea because of its direct adjacent to the Indonesian sea. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing whether the realization of the cooperation that has been implemented has succeeded in reducing the transnational crime of IUU fishing that occurred in the Australian Timor Sea. This study uses qualitative approach and descriptive type of research that uses two data sources, namely primary and secondary. In analysing this research, the author uses bilateral cooperation theory, maritime security and IUU fishing concept. The results of this study indicated that the realization of the cooperation that has been carried out by Indonesia and Australia in the fisheries sector as an effort to tackle IUU fishing in 2017-2021 has not been able to reduce IUU fishing cases in Australian Timor Sea Australia because of the economic factors of Indonesian fishermen who are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. </em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Australia, Australian Timor Sea, Fisheries cooperation, Indonesia, IUU fishing.</em></p> 2022-12-28T08:32:43+07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/article/view/7180 Analisis Strategi Kebijakan Migrasi Internasional Pemerintahan Jokowi Jilid I Dalam Penanganan Human Trafficking 2022-12-28T13:57:47+07:00 Bergitha Yesika Marsel 372019402@student.uksw.edu Narwastu Sharon Sudey 372019605@student.uksw.edu Novriest Umbu W Nau novriest.umbu@uksw.edu <p><em>International migration is an interesting phenomenon to be discussed when the volume of migration is increasing on a large scale. Migrant Workers are one of those who’s prone to the opportunities of human trafficking. According to BNP2TKI data charts for migrants who work as Indonesian migrant workers in 2015-2019 time period, contrasts to the reports on Indonesia’s migrant workers who became victims of human trafficking, which moves up in the graph as many as 259 cases in 2019 compared to 2018. Constructivism believes that communities have constructed each other. Each subsequent action occurs because of certain meaning, and that meaning present as a result of social interaction. The factors that encourage people to be involved in international migration, and the trend of international migration are ideas that underlie the meaning of people's mindsets related to the international migration. Which then presents opportunities for human trafficking. The definition of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, sees that there should be room for restoration for dignity and welfare of victims. This paper discusses the meaning of domestic social construction, considering the national policy regarding International Migration issued during President Joko Widodo’s administration Volume 1 (2014-2019), namely Law no. 18 Year 2017.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Human Trafficking, International Migration, Joko Widodo Administration Vol.1</em></p> 2022-12-28T00:00:00+07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/article/view/7925 Kepentingan Nasional Indonesia Menolak Ratifikasi Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) 2022-12-28T13:57:47+07:00 Agus Subagyo as.unjani2022@gmail.com Henike Primawanti henike@email.unikom.ac.id <p><em>A one of the international agreements under WHO relating to publik health is the FCTC (Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) which aims to protect people in the world from the threat of the impact of cigarette consumption and the implications of exposure to cigarette smoke. To date, Indonesia is the only country in Asia that has not ratified the FCTC. This study wants to find answers to the question why Indonesia refuses to ratify the FCTC? In answering this question, the theoretical basis of James S Rosenau's foreign policy is used. The method used is a qualitative method with interview data collection techniques and literature study. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia rejects FCTC ratification due to systemic fac</em><em>tors (in the form of FCTC being seen as a Western global regime that will dominate the Indonesian tobacco market), governmental faktors (in the form of rejection by the Ministry of Industri and Trade because FCTC is detrimental to the national economy), societal fac</em><em>tors (in the form of pressure from tobacco farmer groups towards FCTC), and idiosyncratic factors (values, experiences, and relations of parliamentarians with tobacco farmers). The novelty found is that the Indonesian government prefers economic interests, compared to publik health interests.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> National Interest, Ratification, FCTC.</em></p> 2022-12-28T12:57:24+07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/article/view/7817 Drone Bayraktar TB2 sebagai Instrumen Diplomasi Pertahanan Internasional Turki 2022-12-28T13:57:47+07:00 Muhammad Yasir Abdad m.yasir.isip19@mail.umy.ac.id Sugito Sugito sugito@umy.ac.id <p><em>&nbsp;The use of the Turkish-made Bayraktar TB 2 Drone in the Azerbaijan war led to a lot of speculation about Turkey's role as the new axis of the modern arms supply country. This study uses the theory of Defense Diplomacy from a non-coercive perspective to analyze the use of drones as a diplomacy instrument. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive with secondary data sources from books, journals and mass media reports. The results of this study indicate that the development of the Bayraktar TB2 Drone by Turkey has an effect on the work system of defense diplomacy, especially in the efforts of Confidence Building Measures (CBMs), increasing defense capabilities by conducting joint military exercises, and defense industry cooperation, which is marked by the signing of agreements or MoUs with various countries in the development of weapons on an international scale. Sources of data on the use of drones as instruments of defense diplomacy are still limited to be a drawback of this research, so that ongoing research is still very much needed as a complement to the data from this research.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong> <em>Bayraktar TB2, CBMs, Defense Diplomacy, Defense Industry, Military Cooperation</em></p> 2022-12-28T09:58:04+07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/gps/article/view/7404 Turkey's Efforts to Normalize Diplomatic Relations with Israel After Withdrawal of Ambassadors both of the Two Countries in 2018 2022-12-28T13:57:48+07:00 Hawa Salsabila hawasalsabila@webmail.umm.ac.id Haryo Prasodjo haryoprasodjo@umm.ac.id Dedik Fitra Suhermanto dfsuhermanto@umm.ac.id <p><em>This study aims to provide information and literacy for readers regarding Turkey's efforts towards normalizing diplomatic relations with Israel after withdrawal of both of their embassies. What makes it interesting is that several times the relationship between Turkey and Israel has progressed and regressed due to the unfinished Israeli attack on Palestine, besides that Turkey also defended Palestine. However, Turkey is currently trying to normalize its relations with Israel for national interest. This study concludes that efforts to normalize relations with Israel are not easy to do because of the efforts of Turkey which still wants to cooperate with the enemy of Palestine. The findings in this study are Turkey's interest in peace efforts with Israel from an economic, political, and security perspective; and efforts to normalize diplomatic relations between Turkey and Israel in 2022. This study will use descriptive research methods and qualitative data analysis techniques that explain how the Turkish government's efforts to normalize relations with Israel are between improving and deteriorating in addition to Turkey's efforts to continue to defend Palestine using secondary data. This study will use the concept of strategy normalization to explain the stages of normalization sought by Turkey in improving its diplomatic relations with Israel.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><strong><em>:</em></strong><em> Diplomatic, Israel, Normalization, Turkey.</em></p> 2022-12-28T03:08:35+07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement##